Talk:Te Joseph celebrent (Franz Xaver Witt)
- Extraneous at in verse 4.
Correction and SATB designation ??
1. It seems that the superfluous 'at' in verse 4 hasn't been corrected. In the linked "text and translations" it is verse 5, btw. No 'at' there!
2. The distance between the 'S-C' parts and the 'T-B' parts, never less than an octave, indicates to me that the the piece should be for TTBB with S-C transposed down an octave. This also makes the tessitura of the current T part appropriate for baritones.