Talk:Cara la vita mia (Giaches de Wert): Difference between revisions
(Created page with ";16144 Bar 20: all parts - ''glocchi'' for ''giocchi''<br> ~~~~") |
m (Claude T a déplacé la page Talk:Cara la mia vita (Giaches de Wert) vers Talk:Cara la vita mia (Giaches de Wert)) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
;16144 | ;16144 | ||
Bar 20: all parts - ''glocchi'' for '' | Bar 18: Cantus - should be B{{natural}}, not B{{flat}}<br> | ||
Bar 20: all parts - ''glocchi'' for ''gl'occhi''<br> | |||
[[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 22:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC) | [[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 22:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC) | ||
;42838, 16144, 11060 | |||
Most errors named apply to all three editions, bar numbers follow 42838.<br> | |||
Bars 2 - 4: the correct text is in all sources <vita mia><br> | |||
Bars 3 - 5: the word is egl' or egli (as written out in the tenor and quinto part), hence: <e-gl'><br> | |||
bars 7 - 9: <v'ars'> with an apostrophe at the end, it's clearly there in the source<br> | |||
bars 33 - 34: not <fum'>, but <furn'> = furno, furono. It's clearly visible in the source, apart from that <smoke> would absolutely make no sense.<br> | |||
bars 41, 43: <cheggio>; <chieggio> would also be acceptable, although it's not in the sources, but <chiegio> is not usual.<br> | |||
[[User:GerhardWeydt|Gerhard Weydt]] ([[User talk:GerhardWeydt|talk]]) 20:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:00, 15 March 2021
- 16144
Bar 18: Cantus - should be B♮, not B♭
Bar 20: all parts - glocchi for gl'occhi
Jamesgibb (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- 42838, 16144, 11060
Most errors named apply to all three editions, bar numbers follow 42838.
Bars 2 - 4: the correct text is in all sources <vita mia>
Bars 3 - 5: the word is egl' or egli (as written out in the tenor and quinto part), hence: <e-gl'>
bars 7 - 9: <v'ars'> with an apostrophe at the end, it's clearly there in the source
bars 33 - 34: not <fum'>, but <furn'> = furno, furono. It's clearly visible in the source, apart from that <smoke> would absolutely make no sense.
bars 41, 43: <cheggio>; <chieggio> would also be acceptable, although it's not in the sources, but <chiegio> is not usual.
Gerhard Weydt (talk) 20:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)