Talk:Johannes Brahms: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply to Arthur) |
(Reply to Bob) |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- [[User:Bobnotts|Bobnotts]] 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST) | :Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- [[User:Bobnotts|Bobnotts]] 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST) | ||
::Great, I'm looking forward to it. However, I have to say things have changed since I wrote the first paragraphs above (the “little mess” has been cleaned up by myself, after much research on Brahms works catalogs). | |||
::Maybe you can post your reply on the Bulletin Board, so as for more people to be aware of it? -- [[User:R|Arthur]] 2007-02-23 06:58 CET (05:58 UTC) |
Revision as of 07:45, 23 February 2007
I would like to do some clean up on this page. The works list by opus number is fine, but there is a little mess at the end: works without opus number should indeed be put there, at the end of the list, but there is a second list with no particular ordering, and I think some rearraging would be necessary.
In addition, would a third list, by genre, be welcome? As far as I can tell such a list usually comes before everything else. Arthur 2007-02-16 05:00 CET (04:00 UTC)
- Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- Bobnotts 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST)
- Great, I'm looking forward to it. However, I have to say things have changed since I wrote the first paragraphs above (the “little mess” has been cleaned up by myself, after much research on Brahms works catalogs).
- Maybe you can post your reply on the Bulletin Board, so as for more people to be aware of it? -- Arthur 2007-02-23 06:58 CET (05:58 UTC)