Talk:Johannes Brahms: Difference between revisions

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reply to Arthur)
(Reply to Bob)
Line 5: Line 5:


:Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- [[User:Bobnotts|Bobnotts]] 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST)
:Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- [[User:Bobnotts|Bobnotts]] 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST)
::Great, I'm looking forward to it. However, I have to say things have changed since I wrote the first paragraphs above (the “little mess” has been cleaned up by myself, after much research on Brahms works catalogs).
::Maybe you can post your reply on the Bulletin Board, so as for more people to be aware of it? -- [[User:R|Arthur]] 2007-02-23 06:58 CET (05:58 UTC)

Revision as of 07:45, 23 February 2007

I would like to do some clean up on this page. The works list by opus number is fine, but there is a little mess at the end: works without opus number should indeed be put there, at the end of the list, but there is a second list with no particular ordering, and I think some rearraging would be necessary.

In addition, would a third list, by genre, be welcome? As far as I can tell such a list usually comes before everything else. Arthur 2007-02-16 05:00 CET (04:00 UTC)

Arthur, I've got a lot to say on this subject so forgive me for not posting yet. A reply will come soon! -- Bobnotts 23:27, 22 February 2007 (PST)
Great, I'm looking forward to it. However, I have to say things have changed since I wrote the first paragraphs above (the “little mess” has been cleaned up by myself, after much research on Brahms works catalogs).
Maybe you can post your reply on the Bulletin Board, so as for more people to be aware of it? -- Arthur 2007-02-23 06:58 CET (05:58 UTC)