Difference between revisions of "User talk:Fysh"

From ChoralWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
I'm really delighted at the work you've undertaken with Manchicourt!  
 
I'm really delighted at the work you've undertaken with Manchicourt!  
  
CPDL editors have resorted to (Nth setting) before, both with a Roman numeral [[Gaude visceribus II (Anonymous)]] and occasionally in English [[In manus tuas (1st setting) (John Sheppard)]]. These are unambiguous because they were copied successively in a unique source (though it's a little confusing there's a [[Gaude visceribus II (Anonymous)]] but no [[Gaude visceribus I (Anonymous)]]). I once preferred [[Parce mihi Domine (1582) (Orlando di Lasso)]] & [[Parce mihi (1565) (Orlando di Lasso)]], his parents having died at the same time and there being no firm chronology for order of composition; I did toy with (imitative) vs. (homophonic) though, thinking it would be easier for others to guess based on a musical description.
+
CPDL editors have resorted to (Nth setting) before, both with a Roman numeral [[Gaude visceribus II (Anonymous)]] and occasionally in English [[In manus tuas (1st setting) (John Sheppard)]]. These are unambiguous because they were copied successively in a unique source (though it's a little confusing there's a [[Gaude visceribus (Anonymous)]] but no [[Gaude visceribus I (Anonymous)]]). I once preferred [[Parce mihi Domine (1582) (Orlando di Lasso)]] & [[Parce mihi (1565) (Orlando di Lasso)]], his parents having died at the same time and there being no firm chronology for order of composition; I did toy with (imitative) vs. (homophonic) though, thinking it would be easier for others to guess based on a musical description.
  
 
All this is a roundabout way of suggesting that it might just be simpler to move [[Pater peccavi (2nd setting) (Pierre de Manchicourt)]] to [[Pater peccavi a 4 (Pierre de Manchicourt)]], with [[Pater peccavi a 5 (Pierre de Manchicourt)]] the only other setting. ;-) [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 04:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)
 
All this is a roundabout way of suggesting that it might just be simpler to move [[Pater peccavi (2nd setting) (Pierre de Manchicourt)]] to [[Pater peccavi a 4 (Pierre de Manchicourt)]], with [[Pater peccavi a 5 (Pierre de Manchicourt)]] the only other setting. ;-) [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] ([[User talk:Richard Mix|talk]]) 04:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:11, 5 October 2019

Welcome

Welcome to CPDL! We hope you will contribute much and well. You will probably want to read the help pages. Again, welcome and have fun! Claude (talk) 12:59, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation

Hi Andrew, I'm really delighted at the work you've undertaken with Manchicourt!

CPDL editors have resorted to (Nth setting) before, both with a Roman numeral Gaude visceribus II (Anonymous) and occasionally in English In manus tuas (1st setting) (John Sheppard). These are unambiguous because they were copied successively in a unique source (though it's a little confusing there's a Gaude visceribus (Anonymous) but no Gaude visceribus I (Anonymous)). I once preferred Parce mihi Domine (1582) (Orlando di Lasso) & Parce mihi (1565) (Orlando di Lasso), his parents having died at the same time and there being no firm chronology for order of composition; I did toy with (imitative) vs. (homophonic) though, thinking it would be easier for others to guess based on a musical description.

All this is a roundabout way of suggesting that it might just be simpler to move Pater peccavi (2nd setting) (Pierre de Manchicourt) to Pater peccavi a 4 (Pierre de Manchicourt), with Pater peccavi a 5 (Pierre de Manchicourt) the only other setting. ;-) Richard Mix (talk) 04:10, 5 October 2019 (UTC)