User talk:Sabine Cassola: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Richard Mix (talk | contribs) (→Beati inmaculati a 6 (Samuel Friedrich Capricornus): new section) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hi, I'm just wondering if the spelling of immaculati is a variant or merely a typo. Nice edition, btw! [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] 09:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC) | Hi, I'm just wondering if the spelling of immaculati is a variant or merely a typo. Nice edition, btw! [[User:Richard Mix|Richard Mix]] 09:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
Hi Sabine, | |||
both editions of [[Tota pulcra es a 12 (Hieronymus Praetorius)]] point to files of the ATTB-edition, so there is no way to access the SATB-edition! | |||
Greetings from Munich, | |||
Oliver | |||
[[User:SingAndGlorify|SingAndGlorify]] 16:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:31, 31 December 2010
La la maître Pierre
Good morning Sabine,
About your edition of La la maître Pierre, i noticed that the transliteration of the tenor text seems misplaced (one note to the left). But do you really think that transliteration is appropriate ? Amicalement
BenZene 05:28, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
Beati inmaculati a 6 (Samuel Friedrich Capricornus)
Hi, I'm just wondering if the spelling of immaculati is a variant or merely a typo. Nice edition, btw! Richard Mix 09:31, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Sabine,
both editions of Tota pulcra es a 12 (Hieronymus Praetorius) point to files of the ATTB-edition, so there is no way to access the SATB-edition!
Greetings from Munich, Oliver
SingAndGlorify 16:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)