Talk:Te Joseph celebrent (Franz Xaver Witt): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with ";10986 *Extraneous ''at'' in verse 4. ~~~~") |
(→Correction and SATB designation ??: new section) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*Extraneous ''at'' in verse 4. | *Extraneous ''at'' in verse 4. | ||
[[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 20:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC) | [[User:Jamesgibb|Jamesgibb]] ([[User talk:Jamesgibb|talk]]) 20:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
== Correction and SATB designation ?? == | |||
1. It seems that the superfluous 'at' in verse 4 ''hasn't'' been corrected. In the linked "text and translations" it is verse 5, btw. No 'at' there! | |||
2. The distance between the 'S-C' parts and the 'T-B' parts, never less than an octave, indicates to me that the the piece should be for TTBB with S-C transposed down an octave. This also makes the tessitura of the current T part appropriate for baritones. | |||
--[[User:Marghek|Marghek]] ([[User talk:Marghek|talk]]) 09:45, 7 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 09:45, 7 September 2013
- 10986
- Extraneous at in verse 4.
Jamesgibb (talk) 20:00, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
Correction and SATB designation ??
1. It seems that the superfluous 'at' in verse 4 hasn't been corrected. In the linked "text and translations" it is verse 5, btw. No 'at' there!
2. The distance between the 'S-C' parts and the 'T-B' parts, never less than an octave, indicates to me that the the piece should be for TTBB with S-C transposed down an octave. This also makes the tessitura of the current T part appropriate for baritones.